Published Paper Details:

Sexual harassment of women at the workplace is a deeply entrenched societal and legal issue that poses a direct challenge to gender equality, human dignity, and the fundamental rights guaranteed by the Constitution of India. Historically, Indian law lacked a unified, specific framework to address workplace sexual harassment until the landmark Supreme Court decision in Vishaka v. State of Rajasthan (1997), which led to the formulation of judicially mandated guidelines. This document delves into the evolution, expansion, and implementation of the legal framework concerning the prevention, prohibition, and redressal of sexual harassment against women at workplaces in India. The paper is an extensive legal, constitutional, and policy analysis that encapsulates the progression of jurisprudence, statutory enactments, policy measures, institutional mechanisms, and critical gaps in India's efforts to combat workplace sexual harassment. It offers a layered understanding of the existing laws, relevant case laws, enforcement agencies, and the socio-legal implications of these frameworks. Constitutional Foundations The document begins by grounding the issue in constitutional jurisprudence. Sexual harassment is not merely a workplace problem--it is a constitutional violation. The Constitution of India, through Articles 14, 15, 16, 19(1)(g), and 21, provides an integrated framework guaranteeing equality, non-discrimination, freedom to practice any occupation, and the right to life with dignity. The document systematically explains how the Indian judiciary has interpreted these rights, particularly in Maneka Gandhi v. Union of India, Francis Coralie v. Union Territory of Delhi, and the Vishaka case, to expand the scope of personal liberty and gender justice. Articles 14 and 15 guarantee equal protection and prohibit discrimination on grounds including sex. Article 16 ensures equality of opportunity in public employment, while Article 19(1)(g) assures the right to a safe work environment. Article 21's interpretation includes the right to dignity, privacy, and protection from sexual harassment. The courts have consistently read these provisions together to affirm that a safe workplace is a constitutional imperative. Additionally, the document explores the relevance of Articles 32 and 226, which empower individuals to seek enforcement of fundamental rights through the Supreme Court and High Courts, respectively. The evolving concept of Public Interest Litigation (PIL) is highlighted as a vital tool in this regard. International Conventions and India's Obligations The abstract continues by emphasizing India's commitments under international law. As a signatory to international treaties like CEDAW and the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, India has a legal and moral obligation to prevent and penalize sexual harassment. The Vishaka judgment is noteworthy for relying heavily on international conventions to fill legislative gaps at the time. Article 253 of the Constitution empowers the Parliament to enact laws implementing such treaties, forming a critical basis for the eventual enactment of the 2013 legislation. Statutory and Criminal Frameworks The document offers a thorough analysis of statutory developments that form part of the legal matrix addressing workplace sexual harassment. Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS) 2023 replaces the Indian Penal Code and contains several relevant provisions: o Sections 294-296: Address obscenity, including public acts and expressions offensive to women's modesty. o Section 354: Criminalizes sexual harassment explicitly, covering physical contact, sexual advances, demands for favors, and showing pornography. o Section 63: Addresses rape, especially when workplace dynamics are exploited. o Section 503: Covers criminal intimidation, including threats to coerce or silence victims. o Section 356: Covers defamation, including workplace rumors aimed at humiliating women. The abstract elaborates on how these sections are applied in workplace contexts and how courts have interpreted them. It includes a discussion on character assassination, digital defamation, and coercion in workplace settings. Procedural and Evidentiary Mechanisms The Bhartiya Sakshya Adhiniyam, 2023 (replacing the Indian Evidence Act) includes crucial provisions that facilitate prosecution, particularly: o Section 120: Presumes absence of consent in rape cases when the victim asserts lack of consent, thereby shifting the burden of proof to the accused. This legal evolution significantly strengthens a woman's position in court, especially in circumstances involving power imbalances typical of workplace settings. Civil Remedies and Tort Law Apart from criminal liabilities, the paper discusses the application of civil law--particularly contract law and tort law--to cases of workplace sexual harassment. The breach of the implied condition of "good faith" in an employment contract and the torts of assault, battery, and intentional infliction of emotional distress provide civil remedies. Victims may seek damages for mental trauma, loss of reputation, or economic harm, offering an additional legal route beyond criminal prosecution. Sector-Specific and Social Welfare Laws The document systematically reviews provisions under sector-specific laws like: o Factories Act, 1948 o Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 o SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 o Information Technology Act, 2000 (with focus on cyber harassment and deepfake threats) o Immoral Traffic (Prevention) Act, 1956 o Indecent Representation of Women (Prohibition) Act, 1986 o National Commission for Women Act, 1990 Each statute is examined for its applicability to sexual harassment cases, particularly in addressing intersectional vulnerabilities such as caste, economic class, and digital manipulation. A crucial modern concern raised is the misuse of AI tools and deepfake technology, which allows for digital sexual harassment, particularly through manipulated images. The paper notes the inadequacy of current legislation in this area and stresses the need for reform. Role of the National Commission for Women and Legislative Evolution The NCW has played a pivotal role in bridging policy gaps. The abstract details how the NCW drafted multiple versions of a comprehensive bill between 2000 and 2006. These drafts progressively expanded the scope of "workplace," "employee," and "employer," and proposed clear complaint mechanisms, internal committees, and district-level monitoring. These drafts also focused on civil redressal mechanisms, including penalties for non-compliance and the rights of victims to counseling, relocation, and compensation. The analysis reveals how these drafts laid the foundation for the final 2013 Act. The Sexual Harassment of Women at Workplace (Prevention, Prohibition and Redressal) Act, 2013 The document then presents a detailed breakdown of the 2013 Act: o Scope and Applicability: Applies to all workplaces--public and private, formal and informal--including educational institutions, hospitals, and homes (for domestic workers). o Key Definitions: Comprehensive definitions of "aggrieved woman," "workplace," "employer," and "employee" are analyzed to show the law's inclusive intent. o Institutional Mechanism: o Internal Complaints Committees (ICC): Mandatory in workplaces with more than 10 employees. o Local Complaints Committees (LCC): Established at district levels for smaller organizations or cases involving employers as accused. o Complaint Procedures: o Time limits, interim relief, conciliation options, and procedures for inquiry. o Power of committees to recommend disciplinary action and monetary compensation. o Employer Duties: o Display information on committees. o Conduct awareness programs. o Provide logistical and legal support to committees and victims. o District Officer's Role: Monitoring implementation and public awareness. o Penalties for Non-Compliance: Monetary fines and other sanctions for failure to constitute committees or act on complaints.